Open procedure project competition for architects, new Swiss Chancellery building in Nairobi, Kenya


3099795 SIMAP - 15.12.2011
Grund: Öffentliches Beschaffungswesen (Zuschlag - Quelle: SIMAP)

1. Contracting authority
1.1 Official name and address of the contracting authority
Authority of need/Authority of assignment: FOBL
Authority of procurement/Organizer: Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics (FOBL), attn Project Management Abroad, Fellerstrasse 21, 3003 Bern, Switzerland, Telephone: +41 31 325 41 57

1.2 Type of contracting authority
Confederation (Central federal administration)

1.3 Type of procedure
Open procedure

1.4 According to GATT/WTO agreement, respectively treaty
Yes

2. Objects of competitions
2.1 Project title of the task of competition
Open procedure project competition for architects, new Swiss Chancellery building in Nairobi, Kenya.

2.2 Common Procurement Vocabulary
CPV: 71000000 - Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services
CSD: 291 - Architect

3. Results of the competition
3.1 Award criteria
without information
3.2 Name and address of the awarded participants
List of tenderers
rank: 1, Architect
Name: ro.ma. roeoesli & maeder gmbh, dipl. architekten eth, bundesstrasse 9, 6003 Luzern, Switzerland

3.3 Recommendation of the jury
The jury recommends that the procurement office mandate the architect who submitted the project ranked first, "Mama Miti", to carry out the further processing of the project.
Entrant ranked first:
ro.ma. roeoesli & maeder gmbh, dipl. architekten ETH, Luzern
The services of the local architect and local construction management are included in this award. In accordance with section 5 of the competition program, the client intends to mandate the authors of the project ranked first in accordance with the jury's recommendation to plan the proposed works within the scope of a KBOB contract. In accordance with section 12 of the competition program, cooperation with a local architect or local construction management is planned for phases 32 to 53 (according to SIA LM 112) of the winning project owing to the distance involved.
Price details:
Fee to be expected (excl. VAT)
CHF 845'000.00

4. Other information
4.1 Invitation to tender
Publications from: 01.07.2011
Organ of publication: Simap, Number of publication 652981
Number of publication 652979

4.2 Names of the members and the substitutes of the jury as well as possible experts
Expert judges (architects):
Hanspeter Winkler, FOBL, Architect ETH/SIA Bern, Chair
Marianne Burkhalter, Architect FSA/SIA , Zurich
Prof. ir. Dick van Gameren, Architect TU Delft, Amsterdam
Charles Pictet, Architect FSA/SIA, Geneva
Simon Hartmann, Architect FSA, Basel, substitute
Pascal Bruchez, FOBL, Architect UAS, Bern, substitute
Christophe Patthey, FOBL, Architect UAS, Bern, substitute
Officials:
Jacques Pitteloud, FDFA, Nairobi Ambassador
Jan Beekman, FDFA, Bern

4.3 Number of participants who placed a project
119

4.4 Additional information
List of prize-winners
1st place / 1st prize: Mama Miti
CHF 30'000.- (excl. VAT)
Architectural: ro.ma. roeoesli & maeder gmbh, dipl architekten ETH, Luzern
2nd place / 2nd prize: Arche
CHF 24'000.- (excl. VAT)
Architectural: Nickisch Sano Walder GmbH, Flims
3rd place / 3rd prize: WHITTAKER
CHF 20'000.- (excl. VAT)
Architectural: Kunz und Mösch GmbH, Architekten ETH SIA BSA, Basel
4th place / 4th prize: Swiss Made
CHF 16'000.- (excl. VAT)
Architectural: ARGE Boltshauser / Flury, Zürich
5th place / 5th prize: LEHM_120
CHF 12'000.- (excl. VAT)
Architectural: FEIXA, Madrid
6th place / 6th prize: MUGUMO
CHF 10'000.- (excl. VAT)
Architectural: Rahbaran Hürzeler Architekten + Manuela Herz Architekten, Basel
7th place / purchase: Doppelter Boden
CHF 8'000.- (excl. VAT)
Architectural: Stiefel Kramer Architecture OG, Wien

4.5 Statement of rights of redress
In accordance with Art. 30 of the Law on Public Procurement an appeal can be lodged in writing within 20 days of publication of the above instruction with the Federal Administrative Court, Postfach 3000 Berne 14. The complaint is to be submitted in duplicate and must contain the request, the reasons supporting it including indication of the evidence and the signature of the complainant or his/her representative. The complaint must be accompanied by a copy of the present publication and by available evidence.

Ganze Publikation anzeigen

Alle Daten und Verweise sind ohne Gewähr und haben keinerlei Rechtswirkung. Dies ist keine amtliche Veröffentlichung. Massgebend sind die vom seco mit einer elektronischen Signatur versehenen SHAB-Daten.